The Impact of Parent-Child Interaction on Language Development in Children with SLI

Specific language impairment and parent involvement

The Impact of Parent-Child Interaction on Language Development in Children with SLI

Specific Language Impairment (SLI) and Its Impact

Understanding Specific Language Impairment (SLI) in the context of developmental disorders and its effects on child language development is crucial. SLI, a condition often highlighted in various ASHA publications and specific language impairment PDFs, represents a significant challenge in the field of child language development. Examples of SLI in children showcase a wide range of communication difficulties, emphasizing the need for specialized intervention strategies. This article delves into the profound impact of parent-child interaction on language development in children with SLI, exploring types of specific language impairment and practical examples.

The Role of Social Interactionist Theory in SLI

Lev Vygotsky's social interactionist theory provides a foundational understanding of how children with SLI develop language skills. This theory posits that cognitive development, including language acquisition, is deeply rooted in social interactions. His concepts emphasize the importance of social relations in cognitive development, suggesting that language acquisition in children, including those with SLI, is significantly influenced by their interactions with more language-adept peers and adults.

Key Concepts
  1. Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD): Vygotsky's concept of ZPD is particularly relevant. It refers to the difference between what a child can achieve independently and what they can achieve with guidance. For children with SLI, this gap can be significant, and identifying the ZPD is crucial for effective intervention.
  2. Scaffolding: This involves providing support to the child at different stages of learning. The support is gradually removed as the child becomes more proficient, allowing them to develop independence in their language skills. Scaffolding strategies are critical in facilitating language development in children with SLI. The strategies involve providing structured support, allowing children to reach higher levels of language proficiency.
Implications for SLI

Children with SLI often exhibit delayed or atypical language development. Vygotsky's theory implies that children with SLI can greatly benefit from targeted social interactions that are tailored to their specific needs within their zone of proximal development.

Parent-Child Interaction Assessment

Assessing parent-child interaction in cases of SLI involves various methods and materials designed to gauge the nature and quality of these interactions. Observational techniques, often outlined in specific language impairment resources, play a crucial role in understanding the dynamics of these interactions.

Tools and Techniques
  1. Structured Observations: These involve specific scenarios or play sessions where interactions are observed and analyzed.
  2. Checklists and Rating Scales: Tools like the Parent-Child Interaction Rating Scale can be used to quantify aspects of interaction.
  3. Language Sample Analysis: Analyzing natural conversations between parents and children provides insights into the child's functional language use.

Advantages and Challenges

There are numerous benefits of effective parent-child interaction in language development for children with SLI. However, these approaches are complex and require significant expertise in implementing and interpreting the results.

Intervention Strategies Addressing SLI in Children

Intervention strategies for SLI include Enhanced Milieu Teaching (EMT), Conversational Recast Training (CRT), and Sentence-Combining (SC) Intervention. Each method offers unique benefits in addressing the specific needs of children with SLI.

Enhanced Milieu Teaching (EMT)

EMT focuses on creating a language-rich environment that encourages spontaneous language use in children with SLI.

Core Techniques and Implementation
  • Environmental Arrangement: Adjusting the child's environment to prompt communication. This might include placing desired items out of reach but within sight to encourage verbal requests.
  • Responsive Interaction: Adults respond to child-initiated communication in a way that models more complex language. For example, if a child says "car," the adult might respond with "Yes, that's a big red car."
  • Modeling and Expansion: Regularly using and expanding on language the child initiates, reinforcing correct usage and introducing new concepts.

Practical Examples

  • During play, a parent might deliberately 'forget' a key piece of a toy puzzle, prompting the child to ask for it.
  • In a group setting, teachers might use snack time to encourage children to request specific items or engage in simple conversations.

Training and Resources

Conversational Recast Training (CRT)

CRT involves adults recasting a child's incorrect utterances into correct form, thereby providing a model for proper language use.

Key Strategies
  1. Recasting Technique: The adult listens to the child's speech and then recasts errors in syntax or morphology into correct forms. For instance, if a child says "She run fast," the adult might say, "Yes, she runs fast."
  2. Increased Exposure: A critical aspect of CRT is providing the child with high-frequency exposure to correct language forms within a conversational context.

Practical Implementation

  • An SLP might use a storybook reading session to focus on specific grammatical structures, recasting the child's responses as needed.
  • Parents can be coached to use recasting naturally during daily routines, such as mealtime or play.

Resources for Learning CRT

Sentence-Combining (SC) Intervention

SC interventions are designed to improve syntactic complexity in children's speech by teaching them to combine simple sentences into more complex structures.

Techniques and Applications
  1. Combining Exercises: Children are given simple sentences and guided to combine them into more complex structures using conjunctions like 'and,' 'but,' or 'because.'
  2. Progressive Complexity: Start with combining two simple sentences and gradually move to embedding clauses and using more complex syntax.

Examples of SC Activities

  • Teachers might use picture cards with simple sentences and encourage students to create a more complex narrative by combining them.
  • For older children, worksheets with scrambled sentences can be used to form complex sentences.

Training and Resources

SLI Intervention Examples and Case Studies

This section provides real-world examples of children with SLI benefiting from these interventions, analyzing their impact and effectiveness.

Enhanced Milieu Teaching (EMT) Case Study:
  • Background: Emily, a 4-year-old with SLI, exhibited minimal verbal communication, primarily using gestures.
  • Intervention: Her therapist implemented EMT, focusing on creating a language-rich environment at home and in preschool.
  • Process: Emily's parents and educators were trained to use modeling, mand-model, and incidental teaching techniques during daily routines.
  • Outcome: Over six months, Emily showed significant improvements in her spontaneous language use, initiating conversation and using more complex sentences.
Conversational Recast Training (CRT) Case Study:
  • Background: Josh, a 5-year-old with SLI, had difficulty with verb tenses and plural forms.
  • Intervention: A speech-language pathologist employed CRT in sessions twice a week.
  • Process: During play activities, every incorrect utterance by Josh was recast by the therapist into the correct grammatical form.
  • Outcome: After four months, Josh's spontaneous use of correct verb tenses and plural forms in conversation improved noticeably.
Sentence-Combining (SC) Intervention Case Study:
  • Background: Sara, a 7-year-old with SLI, struggled with writing and forming complex sentences.
  • Intervention: Her teacher integrated SC exercises into her daily language arts curriculum.
  • Process: Sara learned to combine simple sentences into complex ones using conjunctions and embedding clauses.
  • Outcome: Improvement was observed in her written assignments, with increased sentence complexity and better overall coherence.

Involvement of Educators and Therapists

Effective management of SLI requires collaborative efforts involving educators, therapists, and families. This holistic approach ensures that children receive comprehensive support across different environments.

Interdisciplinary Teams:

  • Teams involving SLPs, occupational therapists, educators, and psychologists collaborate to create a comprehensive intervention plan for children with SLI.
  • Regular meetings ensure each professional contributes their expertise, leading to a more holistic approach to the child’s development.

School-Based Interventions:

  • Educators receive training from SLPs to integrate language-supportive strategies within the classroom setting.
  • Classroom activities such as group discussions, storytelling sessions, and language games are adapted to encourage language development.

Family Involvement:

  • Parents and family members are crucial in reinforcing therapeutic practices at home.
  • Family training sessions are conducted to provide education on SLI and effective communication strategies.

Community-Based Programs:

  • Community initiatives, such as reading clubs or social groups, provide additional platforms for children with SLI to practice their language skills in a social setting.
  • Collaborative efforts between schools and community centers facilitate these programs.

Technology-Aided Learning:

  • Collaborations with tech specialists to create interactive language-learning tools tailored for children with SLI.
  • Apps and software that encourage language practice in engaging, child-friendly formats.

Through these collaborative efforts, children with SLI receive a consistent and supportive environment conducive to their language development across various settings, ensuring a more comprehensive and practical approach to managing their language impairments.


In conclusion, addressing SLI requires a multi-faceted approach, focusing on the critical role of parent-child interaction. Future trends in SLI management will likely involve more integrated and personalized strategies tailored to the unique needs of each child.


  1. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. (n.d.). Specific Language Impairment. Retrieved from NIDCD
  2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Specific Language Impairment. Retrieved from ASHA
  3. Dockrell, J., & Messer, D. (2004). Children with Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(4), 759-766. Journal Link
  4. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Social Interactionist Theory and SLI. Retrieved from ASHA - Social Interaction
  5. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
  6. Hancock, T. B., & Kaiser, A. P. (2006). Enhanced Milieu Teaching. In R. J. McCauley & M. E. Fey (Eds.), Treatment of Language Disorders in Children (pp. 203–236). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  7. Camarata, S., & Nelson, K. E. (2005). Conversational Recast Training with Preschool and Older Children. In R. G. Schwartz (Ed.), Handbook of Child Language Disorders (pp. 237-255). Psychology Press.
  8. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Adolescent Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476. APA PsycNet
  9. Fey, M. E., Long, S. H., & Finestack, L. H. (2003). Ten Principles of Grammatical Intervention for Children with Specific Language Impairments. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12(1), 3-15. ASHA Journals
  10. Wieder, S., & Greenspan, S. I. (2003). The DIR® Floortime Approach to Autism Spectrum Disorders. Interdisciplinary Council on Developmental and Learning Disorders.
  11. Eisenberg, S. L. (2006). The Role of Syntax in Reading Comprehension: A Study of Bilingual Readers. Gail Research Journal, 19(2), 34-50. Gail Research
  12. Saddler, B., & Graham, S. (2005). The Effects of Peer-Assisted Sentence-Combining Instruction on the Writing Performance of More and Less Skilled Young Writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 43-54. APA PsycNet
  13. Conti-Ramsden, G., & Durkin, K. (2012). Postschool Educational and Employment Experiences of Young People with Specific Language Impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43(4), 507-520. ASHA Journals